THE BODY OF AN AMERICAN
|
DEAD DOG PARK
|
The
Body of an American is not an easy
play to describe, but that may be all to the good. It’s about real guys.
Paul
Watson, Canadian photojournalist, is in Mogodishu
in 1993, covering the Somalia uprising. He takes a photo of an American
soldier’s body being dragged through the streets by boys. As he lifts the
camera, he hears a voice both in and outside of his head; he knows it isn’t
his. It says, “If you do this, I will own you forever.” In a way it does. The
picture gets him a Pulitzer Prize and becomes perhaps the defining photo of his
career, crystallizing an enormous retroactive guilt he has to live with; that
as a war correspondent, his having had a good day means someone else had to
suffer. He writes a book about his experiences: Where War Lives. It becomes one of the Globe and Mail’s 100 most notable books of 2007.
Playwright
Dan O’Brien reads the book, emails
Watson—he thinks there’s a play in all this, somewhere. Though normally
reticent about correspondence, something about O’Brien intrigues Watson. Thus
begins a long exchange of emails. They don’t meet in person for years, until
finally Watson invites O’Brien to join him in Yellowknife, a small city with a
subarctic climate in the Northwest Territories of Canada, there to discuss
rather intense life philosophies.
The
play, a two-hander, is about those two men and that relationship, and their
backstories as revealed to each other within that relationship. Primarily Michael Cumpsty plays Watson and Michael Crane plays O’Brien, but at unpredictable moments, most of which seem to occur during narrative transition or
flashback, they switch off; not only trading roles but assuming the roles of
others they encounter in the past or present. It’s absolutely fluid and, once
the surprise of the device wears off and sinks in, absolutely clear, broadening
the sense of panorama, even though the stage is barren of anything but a
(perhaps deceptively) rudimentary design that allows for movable chairs and
some projections. Under Jo Bonney’s
direction, the pair play off each other beautifully; and if Crane as the
acolyte seems somewhat the less powerful of the two, it’s a fitting (however
unintentional) disparity—Watson should naturally be the charismatic
figure and the fascinating enigma; and in delivering that, Cumpsty may be
giving the best performance of his career. He gives us a man full of
contradictions: deeply haunted, somewhat self-destructive, personal life a shambles—yet
always controlled, matter-of-fact and wry about it, as if watching himself and
bemusedly entertained by it all.
But
that’s not the only “best”—as often happens with plays that are quietly
theatrical, like Wit and How I
Learned to Drive, modest-seeming things
that almost sneak in on little cat’s paws, that need little more than a room
and an audience—it’s the ideas and language and unique characterizations
of The Body of an American that explode
in your mind, even as they take root. So far, I’d mark it the best play of the
season.
****************
By pure
coincidence, the evening after I finished writing the review above, I saw Dead
Dog Park (or as the author’s script
would have it, dEAD dOG pARK) by
Barry Malawer, which arguably gives The
Body of an American a run for its money as
an important new drama.
On
the one hand, it doesn’t really cover
new ground. Variations on story it tells has been told before, in particular on
television. It starts with a cop looking out fourth story window in an
abandoned tenement building, from which a 14 year old black kid has fallen. The
cop had been chasing the kid. Did he try to grab the escaping kid to save him;
or did he push him?
In
drama, the basic premise goes back at least to 1969, a crossover episode of the
ABC TV series Felony Squad and Judd
for the Defense, called “The Law and Order
Blues.” I may not recall this entirely
correctly—I saw it but the once, so put “I think” after every
plot-step—the cop played by Howard Duff is chasing a black murder suspect
who falls down a flight of stairs; defense lawyer Clinton Judd (Carl Betz) has
to defend the black guy (Brock Peters) against a murder charge, and one of the
big questions is did the cop push him or did he fall accidentally? Now, why did
this make such an impression? No, not my semi-renowned TV geekoid reflex; this
was quite different. I was maybe 15, my parents were away on vacation, and left
my younger brother and me in the charge of Bessie Thompson, the African
American house worker (she absolutely refused the term maid) who came to clean
twice a week and was something of an auxiliary parent, watching us grow up. I
knew, of course, that the cop would not have pushed the suspect, because he was
the ethical hero of Felony Squad, even
though the racial controversy in which he was embroiled was perfectly
understandable as drama; but as
drama you were also meant to worry whether
the cop would be exonerated. Ms. Thompson was understandably more concerned
about the victim, but vehemently so—to
the point of not quite factoring in that these were actors, that the script was
written, and that the convention of the time would not have presented a morally
ambiguous cop as a series hero. As far as
she was concerned, Howard Duff had actually, and these are her words, “pushed that boy down the
stairs!” And no attempt to frame the event
as TV drama held any sway. She got very angry at me and said, “You don’t
understand!” The episode had triggered all sorts of bad associations, and her
righteous indignation was more charged than the episode. And this collision of
perspectives is, of course, key to Mr. Malawer’s play.
In
Dead Dog Park, though, the cop, Rob
McDonald (Tom O’Keefe) is not beyond reproach, and absolutely exists as a figure of moral ambiguity, not least to
himself. Which makes things difficult for his wife (Suzannah Millonzi) and his partner (Migs Govea); further fuels the rage and determination of the kid’s
mother (Eboni Flowers), and gives
mercenary, famously flamboyant attorney (Ryann Quinn) much ammo to work with. The victim (Jude Tibeau) isn’t someone we’ll meet until much later. Years later.
What
makes the play worth attention is the full, layered characterizations dealt out
with brisk economy, the muscular drive of the dialogue, the avoidance of
anything neatly resolved, the surprisingly decades-long timeline arc and the
bracing reminder that such things still happen over 45 years after that
crossover TV episode.
Just
as impressive is the work of the cast and the direction of Eric Tucker, who reduces the physicality of the play to a black box
essence not made mandatory by the play, yet preserving everything important and
eliciting—in some ways reveling in the ability to elicit—the
complicity of the audience to fill in many blanks. Which may even be a metaphor
for the long game of the play itself.
Go to David Spencer's Profile
Return to Home Page