AISLE SAY Florida
NEXT FALL
by Geoffrey
Nauffts
Directed by
Kate Alexander
Florida
Studio TheatreÕs Keating Mainstage
1241 N. Palm
Ave., Sarasota, 941-366-9000
January 25
through March 31, 2012
Reviewed by
Marie J. Kilker
Car Crash!
Now LukeÕs in a coma in a Jewish
hospital where his long-divorced
parents Butch and Arlene have been summoned to be with him. Adam, his lover of five years, has
rushed to do the same. Not officially family, Adam is denied access. Also
waiting are LukeÕs friends Holly, who employed both in her candle business, and
Brandon, LukeÕs co-religionist
whoÕs not as close to him as he once was.
In flashbacks that alternate with the hospital scene, Luke relationship to everyone, but
essentially with Adam, unfolds.
Except for
both falling in love at first sight, Adam and Luke contrast vitally.
Hypochandriac, middle-aged businessman Adam is openly gay, narcisistic, not
very sociable, and self-satisfied as an atheist. Outgoing, likeable, young hopeful actor Luke, a
born-again Christian much into religious ritual (prayers before meals
and after f--ing), has kept guilt
feelings about gay sex and remained closeted to his parents. Adam is grounded
in the present; Luke always has eternity on his mind. Adam wants to be first in
LukeÕs life; Luke wants Adam to share his faith in being saved by Jesus so they
all can be together in life after death.
Crash! What happens regarding this situation and attendant conflicts in the waiting
room?
Though
tackling the subjects of age, attachments to family and friends, and
particularly religion as divisive factors in a love relationship, Next
Fall plays out
much like a sitcom. LukeÕs parents are stereotypes, despite the
considerable skill of Phillip Clark and Judith Hawking in making them real people as well. LukeÕs father
(named Butch!) is a consummate redneck, literally biblical to his core, readily
blind to who Adam is and why heÕs so anxious about Luke. Not by nature cut out to be a mother or
any kind of nurturer, Arlene is a loud Southern too-fat-to-be-belle. She tries to be ingratiating and really has
a heart though always not of gold, as evidenced by her having divorced Butch
and leaving him to raise Luke.
Both parents have stayed in denial
but react differently on finally
seeing the truth. Their
actions both humanize and individualize them. To give a full context to the
present predicament of understanding Adam and Luke, there are Katherine
Michelle TannerÕs Holly and Kenajuan BentleyÕs intriguing Brandon. Holly seems
to be there, not mainly as the proverbial fag-hag, but to comment (right out of the play Our Town that Luke
starred in) on the playÕs motif of the worthiness of life and reflecting on it.
For Brandon, thereÕs a
religious line to cross over to practice or even openly approve of
gay sexual ity. Could he, did he do either with Luke or, in fact, anyone?
Since author Nauffts has
incompletely drawn the character of Brandon, it is intriguing that Kate Alexander has cast and directed an attractive,
tight-lipped, African-American in the role to proclaim vehemently that he likes
black men only.
So whatÕs in
NaufftsÕ play--in addition to a number of humorous touches--to distinguish it
from a spate of fashionable plays about gays having problems outing to their families or in general, or being
fully compatible with their partners, or feeling comfortable with their
homosexuality? Answer: The
contrasting religious beliefs of Luke and Adam and their commitment to
them, particularly as that affects their relationship. Several scenes of confrontation between
them on the issues just go poof
before reaching any conclusions, much less alterations of eitherÕs views. How far does LukeÕs failure to out
himself to his father finally extend and what does that mean? Why is LukeÕs
last look at Adam so important? Except for the parents acknowledging the truth
about Luke being gay, has anyone decisively changed in the dramaÕs time in the (why Jewish?) hospital? Like a
sitcom, the play seems to have gone from a series of inconclusive episodes to
the same kind of ending. (As if
with an end-of-TV-season offering, FSTÕs sponsoring a blog-forum where
audiences can discuss the issues raised in the play, especially the religious
one.)
As for the
FST production, scenic designer Michael Schweikardt fails to solve the problem
of NaufftsÕ oft-changing settings. An obviously fake rear window
with skyline silhouette distinguishes the sparse hospital waiting room from the
center of the guysÕ mod apartment solely via use of a drape, and thatÕs not consistent.
Only an imitation stained glass hanging
turns the center into a chapel for visitors. Arrivals to the room
through a single door on house left all scrunch up after entering and for a
hurried final glimpse of Luke (melodramatic as can be) on his death bed (which
I guess is supposed to be in another hospital room). Far right shows viewers
the hotel room where the guys first met, also later uses shelved knick knacks
to define part of their apartment, or becomes a place where Adam gives and gets
phone messages in or out of town. Lighting changes (by
Micheal Foster) seem valient attempts at smooth transitions but scenery and
props shuffling by actors and crew members take too much time and often break mood. Director Alexander gets her actors to seem oblivious to
the amateurish qualities of the script but she hasnÕt surmounted the
difficulties of disguising them in its staging. When one of the characters waiting to hear of LukeÕs chance
at life says that "itÕs
over" Ð well, for many in the audience, 2 hours and 20 minutes of it
have been interesting but enough.
Return to Home Page
Road
(National) Tour Review Index
New
York City & Environs Theatre Review
Index
Berkshire,
Massachusetts Theatre Review
Index
Boston
Area Theatre Review Index
Florida
Theatre Review Index
Minneapolis/St.
Paul (Twin Cities) Theatre
Review Index
Philadelphia
& Environs Theatre Review
Index
San
Francisco Bay Area Theatre Review Index
Seattle
Area Theatre Review Index
Toronto,
Ontario (Canada) Index